11 items from the full length DASH were extracted to constitute the QuickDASH. 387.5518 560.1761 388.1684 565.7257 389.4014 570.8641 c /GS3 gs 336.5382 104.8076 336.8502 105.0107 337.2052 105.0107 c 453.7358 493.0674 454.4549 484.1264 456.2023 475.9048 c 330.2819 84.9082 m 9.44326 13.72 TD 1.55566 0 TD [(people with musculoskeletal upper)50(-limb)]TJ 361.4561 103.8359 l 405.6393 177.2556 l f Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Disabilities of the Arm 480.8669 522.1514 480.7641 505.9138 479.3251 489.7788 c /F12 1 Tf 279.8427 82.3784 l 435.5455 616.4937 434.1065 616.0831 433.5927 617.3163 c 363.9142 94.6694 363.5157 94.3647 363.2111 94.0312 c q QuickDASH OUTCOME MEASURE INSTRUCTIONS This questionnaire asks about yoursymptoms as well as your ability toperform certain activities. Tj The QuickDASH Outcome Measure: Questionnaire - University of South Florida 354.127 101.9726 l T* 279.2267 104.0546 l 321.5743 91.6318 l [(corr)20(elation of the twelve was)]TJ 257.483 96.2573 l 301.2843 91.3681 l 333.8488 84.6543 333.3048 84.2412 333.1242 83.8496 c 362.7686 102.3715 363.3781 101.9003 364.132 101.9003 c 1 1 1 1 K 238.2643 99.4126 237.5087 98.6567 236.5758 98.6567 c 368.4367 148.8909 m 266.0258 106.1108 l 367.6407 101.9726 l (scor)Tj 312.7369 91.6318 m 231.6825 106.853 l f (Responsiveness)Tj 10 0 0 10 36 697.5294 Tm BT (c)Tj 331.4781 104.6845 330.9054 104.039 330.9054 103.3574 c 385.5343 104.6845 384.8956 104.1552 384.8165 103.4736 c 363.7979 91.958 l 3.13208 0.00001 TD 324.4674 94.5971 l The high correlation between Quick-DASH score and patient satisfaction and functional outcome indicates that the Quick-DASH questionnaire is a suitable tool for evaluating adult humeral shaft fracture outcomes. 0.33277 0 TD 403.6868 167.1845 l 270.538 83.2026 l (s)Tj 235.9357 96.2597 l [(DASH versions\) wer)20(e)]TJ 342.5997 106.5546 l 15.504 0 0 15.504 98.2279 649.714 Tm 321.5602 92.2407 l 434.5175 453.7064 m 0 0 0 1 k Please answer everyquestion, basedon your condition in the last week,bycircling the appropriate number. (DASH development gr)Tj W n /F10 1 Tf (2001). /GS2 gs /GS2 gs The QuickDASH-9 is a single-page PRO with nine items extracted from the QuickDASH and DASH. 440.2726 614.0273 435.6481 612.1777 431.2289 610.2251 c 319.0372 81.5439 318.2472 82.2402 318.2472 83.2114 c 321.1398 101.915 320.4293 101.5742 319.7335 101.5742 c 0.026 Tw [(is done to make the scor)20(e easier to)]TJ 359.0421 101.5742 358.3243 102.2192 358.3243 103.2924 c 367.2931 94.5971 m 449.2136 352.2727 449.522 351.0395 449.1109 350.32 c 377.4804 151.5633 m 414.4776 245.3923 421.9794 258.444 426.5018 273.4482 c S 10 0 0 10 222 395.96 Tm -0.0002 Tc 286.5473 101.2783 286.0592 101.038 285.587 101.038 c (26.8 vs. 47.1)Tj q 366.6622 106.5546 l 10 0 0 10 63.8917 364.0636 Tm 0 Tw 386.4113 94.2563 387.216 94.9956 388.2306 94.9956 c 314.4191 86.851 l f 391.971 154.7491 391.3542 156.9072 391.7653 159.7847 c 267.2499 91.288 266.3937 92.0561 266.3937 93.2163 c Q 280.7628 87.3945 l 0 792 0 0 re Q 287.6353 82.3784 l 238.8883 87.896 l 440.6044 333.8635 m 0.026 Tw 14 0 0 14 111.8256 737.0585 Tm 400.6037 95.4509 399.3705 100.8979 398.8567 105.8307 c Background: The QuickDASH is a shorter version of the DASH that may reduce respondent burden while retaining . 322.8727 101.6464 l [(under)30(going tr)19(eatment; expected)]TJ 0.026 Tw Scoring the DASH 30-item disability/symptom section: 335.5382 94.9956 335.6613 94.4448 335.6613 93.6835 c 271.85 104.5107 272.4742 104.8945 273.2343 104.8945 c 235.7345 96.2597 235.9357 96.2597 v 437.3951 450.3151 436.265 452.2678 435.6481 454.5288 c 0 0 0 1 k Mintken (2009; n=101; mean age=40.3(18.5) years): SEM=4.8. T* -8.74366 -1.30001 TD 252.129 96.0405 252.129 92.0952 y 18.72 0.3 TD /GS0 gs -37.2 -10.63366 TD Nakamoto, H., Y. Oshima, et al. (Fax: (416) 927-4167)Tj 385.1642 91.8999 384.4533 91.559 383.7579 91.559 c 456.5103 360.4945 m 394.1291 166.6704 m 365.4943 101.915 364.7843 101.5742 364.088 101.5742 c BT 330.4562 94.9233 l 341.5846 91.958 l 9.15625 0 TD 392.0738 129.879 m [(dized r)20(esponse mean; V)89(AS - visual analogue scale)]TJ 401.1174 267.1793 400.09 270.1599 401.5284 272.6263 c /F2 1 Tf 414.0665 143.2391 413.8611 147.4525 412.4222 150.9469 c 17.37722 0 TD 382.8243 116.5187 382.0022 112.9218 382.4133 108.8111 c Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders: Fayad (2009): No item had a floor or ceiling effect. 355.0983 96.8662 l q 440.6044 302.6637 m (n)Tj -8.43677 -1.3 TD BT BT 283.2831 104.0546 l /GS2 gs 395.5681 83.016 395.3623 76.3357 393.1016 71.3002 c Tj 383.9549 152.077 m 0.026 Tw 324.4674 94.9233 l f 333.1242 84.2773 m 286.2752 85.0024 286.4752 85.1464 286.6913 85.2426 c 374.8087 137.6892 378.2 134.4007 382.1047 132.1396 c q /F2 1 Tf 400.2952 255.6693 402.1453 259.9853 401.7342 264.3018 c 324.7433 101.9003 324.8878 102.3715 324.8878 102.5166 c 0 0 0 1 k 0 -1.3 TD 252.129 97.6328 252.129 101.6997 y (All Pearson pr)Tj (gr)Tj -7.9177 -1.3 TD (Quick)Tj 0.026 Tw (23.6 vs. 47.1)Tj 2.90454 0 TD (The )Tj 289.4596 95.1445 289.8117 94.9126 289.8117 94.4804 c 312.7369 91.9794 l 297.7562 93.7763 m (I)Tj f 280.6669 93.1123 l Information on)]TJ 405.1255 151.5633 407.3861 148.2747 408.5172 144.6776 c A refined content and validity analysis of the short form of the disabilities of the shoulder, arm and hand questionnaire in the strata of symptoms and function and specific joint conditions." 367.2931 94.5971 l 353.3873 101.6464 l 247.7008 87.5815 l 324.8878 103.5097 322.5099 102.9082 322.5099 104.1259 c 321.9371 96.8662 l (Development of the )Tj It does not measure the same content as the DASH although the total score levels of both instruments are similar. 432.1538 522.4594 434.0038 520.9182 436.0593 519.0681 c 336.3859 101.9726 l DASH 0.68 in elbow (P = 0.015); effect size in shoulder 1.42 vs. f 0 Tc f 270.5939 82.5781 271.09 82.3061 271.6581 82.3061 c BT 374.0285 92.4292 374.6447 91.8852 375.4708 91.8852 c 257.483 97.4126 l ET 238.8883 87.896 l 421.4659 575.0778 418.3829 560.4845 418.7939 544.658 c "Internal consistency and validity of the QuickDASH instrument for upper extremity injuries in older children." 1,23. and Rasch analysis, 12,13. but many different approach-es have been used to calculate the respon-siveness of these measures, in particular the minimal clinically important differ-ence (MCID), also known as the mini- 0 Tw 394.8485 168.4178 394.1291 168.0062 393.718 167.8009 c /F12 1 Tf 330.6447 86.1479 l q 360.8317 154.5434 358.1599 151.9743 357.132 149.0967 c [(pr)20(oduced. 1 w /GS2 gs 278.6666 104.0546 l q 238.1012 99.4965 237.4091 98.8042 236.5558 98.8042 c -11.34547 -1.3 TD 416.8413 145.9109 419.7189 142.1086 416.5329 140.2584 c 397.3151 117.6493 395.5681 112.3054 396.0818 105.317 c 356.6182 149.0967 356.2071 149.5078 355.8987 149.9189 c 12 0 0 12 36 717.7294 Tm 318.6095 83.1171 m 345.6447 104.4594 345.4122 104.6845 344.8468 104.6845 c 393.8207 129.7763 l 239.4904 95.9711 241.6666 90.1752 241.848 89.6918 c Q Niekel, M. C., A. L. Lindenhovius, et al. Thanks for helping us invest in our patients. Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder & Hand - Shirley Ryan AbilityLab 10 0 0 10 245.5181 449.36 Tm 350.3859 90.6386 350.8717 90.7905 351.089 91.4506 c 344.3615 94.9233 l /GS3 gs 435.9565 610.842 439.1425 612.0753 442.2253 612.7941 c 339.547 104.6845 338.88 104.2128 338.88 103.2851 c q ET f 277.9706 82.3784 m /GS2 gs 238.1012 100.3501 m 290.1873 104.8144 l /F11 1 Tf 287.4755 92.1284 l -6.12036 -1.30002 TD Q 345.8839 91.6318 l 0 -1.3 TD Scoring Patients are asked to answer all sections and respond based on their ability to perform activities over the past week; only one answer per question. (Quick)Tj 386.216 234.7039 386.0103 237.3761 386.9351 240.0483 c 392.6905 69.7584 391.2516 66.9836 389.4014 68.6278 c (2011). 329.5929 94.9956 330.1154 94.7636 330.4415 94.3286 c Fan, Z. J., C. K. Smith, et al. (2013). 10 0 0 10 36 612.7 Tm 426.6043 364.9133 427.3239 369.6408 431.2289 372.3131 c 343.4113 91.6318 l 334.6466 81.9428 l f BT 10 0 0 10 447.5117 112.4084 Tm 0 0 0 1 k 349.4943 101.6464 m 300.0043 91.3681 l 365.4367 91.958 l /CS1 CS 1 SCN 274.8583 104.8144 l 0 0 0 1 K /GS3 gs 306.8204 107.1118 m 8.74366 0.00001 TD 361.5001 102.3354 l 284.6351 86.6347 m 249.516 96.2597 248.0936 96.2597 y ET 385.0854 160.5042 387.3462 163.1763 387.6546 166.5676 c (2006). (Item Response Theor)Tj 378.5372 94.5971 l 341.9474 96.4384 l 465.8623 477.2407 466.6845 475.0827 466.4793 474.0552 c 385.2443 93.4585 m 316.9708 91.9794 l Polson, K., D. Reid, et al. (than the others, and was chosen and)Tj 438.7314 371.6963 436.7786 373.649 438.2173 375.7044 c endstream endobj 16 0 obj << /Length 6059 >> stream [(multiple musculoskeletal disor)20(ders of)]TJ Methods We assessed the QuickDASH Japanese version (Quick-DASH-JSSH),6 using volunteers including our institution's staff,theirfamilymembers,andtheparticipantsinthegroup 0 Tc 1 0 obj << /OPM 1 /Type /ExtGState >> endobj 3 0 obj << /BitsPerSample 8 /Domain [ 0 1 ] /Size [ 2 ] /FunctionType 0 /Range [ 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 ] /Length 8 >> stream 0.44386 0.00001 TD 0.15 scn Physiopedia is not a substitute for professional advice or expert medical services from a qualified healthcare provider. f )Tj 466.1707 473.541 463.2932 469.225 459.9019 466.3476 c 429.6873 523.7957 m 391.868 168.1092 390.0184 168.5204 388.2714 168.0062 c PDF The QuickDASH Outcome Measure: Information for Users - Peak RehabCare 351.546 92.8496 l 0.15 scn 325.2579 102.06 324.7433 101.5742 323.9816 101.5742 c 0.67351 0 Td 234.2794 97.4126 l 383.6465 161.7375 385.2908 164.2038 386.216 166.9787 c /GS2 gs (Missing Items)Tj T* 336.1544 81.9428 l 0 Tc 366.6622 101.6464 l /GS3 gs 377.275 76.3357 376.6582 77.8773 376.0418 79.2132 c endstream endobj 13 0 obj [ /Separation /PANTONE#20293#20U /DeviceCMYK 12 0 R ] endobj 14 0 obj << /Length 30558 >> stream q 0 -1.3 TD /F1 1 Tf h 293.684 94.3046 l 430.7152 373.0321 428.454 378.1707 427.6319 383.4121 c 271.0663 92.1284 l ET q -0.0003 Tc 0.33283 0.00001 TD 301.2843 95.1767 l 1 w 455.6882 502.111 455.6882 503.3447 454.5577 503.2415 c /F2 1 Tf f 355.0983 91.9794 l 241.1015 97.4126 l 332.174 81.9428 l f 479.5309 660.8909 m 355.8956 103.0893 l 0 -1.30001 TD /GS3 gs 266.3937 94.3764 267.2499 95.1445 268.3859 95.1445 c 390.3267 223.0913 387.963 215.486 387.0382 206.6481 c -2.2004 -1.3 TD 318.3556 103.1474 m let the examiners self-assess their own work as manual or non-manual, and Klum et al . 253.2826 96.0405 253.2826 92.0952 y "Reliability of a visual analog version of the QuickDASH." Tj 338.88 102.4077 339.547 101.9003 340.2648 101.9003 c 412.011 128.132 411.0863 128.44 410.778 127.8236 c 10 0 0 10 78.6465 299.1599 Tm (f)Tj (2009). 321.1544 84.9804 321.8356 84.1977 321.8356 83.1171 c 298.9081 91.5522 298.4201 91.2402 297.7321 91.2402 c 328.9478 81.6167 l 10 0 0 10 78.4707 581.6966 Tm 370.2864 165.5398 372.1363 166.5676 373.7805 168.212 c 453.4274 424.1091 455.277 422.2589 456.4076 420.7172 c 327.7296 92.5234 328.252 91.8852 329.0856 91.8852 c 36 118.4517 m 0.80342 0 Td f 287.0272 91.3681 l Some people find percentiles easier to understand than standard scores, so in the DASH we discuss the significance of two cut off points, the 5th and 15th percentile (see page 50 DASH Manual). [(based on their r)20(elative dif)9(ficulty;)]TJ q 365.0743 91.958 l ET 399.9868 170.6785 397.7262 168.7258 395.1571 168.0062 c q /GS3 gs This 3rd edition of The DASH and Quick DASH Outcome Measure User's Manual was published in 2011. BT T* 356.1349 91.9794 l /CS2 cs 1 scn 263.7775 81.6181 m 37.5 37.4999 537 717 re /GS3 gs 346.4567 91.958 l 284.5072 94.3764 m /GS3 gs 281.3226 82.3784 l 0 Tw (ed using data)Tj f 328.9478 81.9428 l T* 0 -1.3 TD (total DASH scor)Tj 355.7433 91.9794 l -0.0001 Tc 0 -1.3 TD 257.483 106.853 l (Conceptual Method)Tj 351.546 94.5971 l f 361.5724 91.958 l 0.3271 w /GS0 gs 336.234 91.958 l 382.5538 105.0107 382.9093 104.8584 383.2354 104.561 c 235.9357 89.0483 l 292.5638 93.3125 l 0 Tw 374.2943 120.3211 376.1445 131.2148 371.0058 139.8475 c . -0.78461 -1.3 TD 257.483 96.2597 l /GS2 gs 283.9791 84.5546 l 0.026 Tw 409.0309 573.8447 409.0309 575.1807 409.1336 576.2084 c (advantages to using the full DASH)Tj 241.4647 89.3637 l 414.6833 530.1673 417.0467 536.539 419.102 542.3969 c ET [(completed for a scor)20(e to be calculated. -0.0002 Tc 290.1873 101.8383 290.3156 101.8061 290.5475 101.8222 c 418.4856 140.2584 l BT 247.7018 81.7065 l /F12 1 Tf 379.7335 90.6386 l 247.7018 87.5844 l 246.308 89.3618 l -0.0001 Tc BT 272.4342 95.0644 l 276.3065 104.8144 m 0 -1.3 TD 332.7614 86.5249 l 340.1271 92.3203 l 287.7553 85.3945 288.5553 85.1464 288.5553 84.3144 c 470.6926 477.9603 469.0482 476.8296 467.1986 477.6518 c 263.7855 106.8945 l BT "Usefulness of QuickDASH in patients with cervical laminoplasty." 4.78955 0 TD 376.4529 137.792 374.3976 139.1283 372.6501 140.3616 c 428.3514 483.51 429.2763 476.5217 430.5094 469.533 c 287.6353 84.4106 287.3951 84.6264 287.0592 84.6264 c [(type, pilot testing of per)10(for)-1(mance in)]TJ 1 by U.S. News & World Report for 31st Consecutive Year, Community-Ready Upper Extremity Interactive Rehabilitation, Dr. Lieber To Receive AACPDM's Lifetime Achievement Award for Research on Cerebral Palsy, Global Advisory Services Hospital Training & Consulting, Medical Student Education & Residency Program, Bundled Webinars: Spinal Cord Injury (3 Titles), 1 Year Webinar Package - Unlimited Access, Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder & Hand, Making Waves Following a Spinal Cord Injury, Full Circle After a Non-Traumatic Brain Injury, An Unanticipated Head Injury and Incredibly Bright Future. 415.2997 600.7702 413.8611 595.2206 411.4973 590.2878 c f 394.4376 203.976 396.2871 217.7472 400.5009 230.0794 c T* 317.609 81.9643 l /GS2 gs 385.4966 120.0131 384.8797 120.1158 384.4685 119.91 c 313.7955 84.538 l 447.8777 633.0399 460.5184 646.4 474.3922 658.0132 c 264.3937 82.4023 l 238.8883 87.896 l /GS3 gs -0.0002 Tc 10 0 0 10 36 265.96 Tm 252.129 97.6328 252.129 97.4126 v /GS2 gs 10 0 0 10 245.5181 640.8966 Tm -9.21939 -1.30001 TD 1 w 281.099 96.3608 l 267.4979 84.2426 l f /GS3 gs 344.3615 91.958 l 386.6271 187.8409 386.8324 187.2245 387.3462 186.5051 c 382.4133 281.3616 385.8049 312.6036 393.5122 341.0711 c
Categories
